Image : http://www.flickr.com
There is something frighteningly logical, in the sinister sense, about the strange course of events which occurred prior to, and on, September 11, 2001 in New York City at the World Trade Center, that made the official explanation of the 9/11 Commission concerning the collapse of the WTC towers (that fires created by exploding jet airliners crashed by Islamic terrorists into the towers caused them to ultimately collapse) extremely illogical. Passing time, of course, makes the real cause of any tragic criminal act less deductively obvious when that precious time, directly after the crime is committed, is spent spinning the blame on a plausible scapegoat instead of properly investigating the crime scene, ferreting out all of the probable suspects, and every relevant and material fact, and piece of evidence, surrounding the crime.
Invariably, the true logic of any deductive inference about a crime, drawn from facts based upon witness observations at the time any crime occurs, is, in most cases, inextricably connected to at least one event, called the smoking gun, that cannot be refuted or distorted by conjecture and speculation. Another deductive aspect of the precious time passing after the commission of a crime is that, if, perchance, the culprits are actually the ones in control of the investigation, there certainly “won’t” be any sort of proper forensic investigation to determine causation, but, rather, a well-calculated farce of what would appear to be an investigation, in order to appease the duped public. Furthermore, any independent attempt to pursue a proper investigation in the ensuing weeks, months, and years of the crime, by its wary victims and their advocates, would be officially called ridiculous by the culprits and thwarted using their manipulative and coercive resources, unlimited in scope.
After a thoughtful consideration of the facts, a deceitful federal government conspiracy to destroy the Twin Towers, and bomb the Pentagon, is unquestionably logical, though horrible and grotesque in effect, when the one prevailing incontrovertible observation, the veritable 9/11 smoking gun, showed conclusively that jet airliners, alone, crashing into WTC Towers 1 and 2, could not have caused them to collapse. This telltale observation, which is beyond speculation, was the strange series of explosions in, and the implosive collapse of, Tower 7, when the smaller building should not have fallen at all, since it wasn’t struck by any aircraft, and wasn’t on fire. So, when it collapsed in the same implosive fashion as Towers 1 and 2, an apparent fault, unanticipated by the conspirators, in the plan to destroy the WTC was readily noticeable. The thing obviously spoke for itself, for the conspirators must have planned for Tower 7 to also be set on fire directly, or indirectly, from the aerial crashes. When this didn’t happen, Tower 7 had to be imploded by the conspirators, like the other towers, to ensure that the explosives, carefully placed in the building and used in the plotted implosions, were consumed in the blast and undetectable in the immense amount of rubble created thereby. Moreover, the federal conspirators also had to eliminate any testimony from people present in Tower 7 at the time the explosives were detonated to destroy the building. This created another unexpected blurb in the federally planned conspiracy, which has been explained quite clearly in detail in the Internet video, “Loose Change,” as far as 9/11’s conspiratorial origin and motive are concerned.
In his latest book, “The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Official Report about 9/11 is Unscientific and False,” author David Ray Griffin documents that two men, Barry Jennings and Michael Hess, were in Tower 7 just prior to its collapse, and stated that Jennings, official liaison for the Housing Authority to New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management, stated that he and Hess, Chief Counsel for the City of New York and managing partner in the financing firm Giuliani & Partners, were on the 6th floor of Tower 7 when an explosion occurred that knocked a hole in a wall on the floor’s lobby just prior to firefighters, or government operatives posing as firefighters, leading them out of the building over what Jennings later described in his original testimony as multiple dead bodies. This information, which was not a part of the official “9/11 Commission Report,” makes a federal government conspiracy even more logical.
The original testimony of Michael Hess, which conformed precisely to Jennings’ testimony, was, later, strangely redacted in a 2002 book written by Rudy Giuliani that catered exclusively to the official federal version of the 9/11 events and timeline. Jennings, however, stuck to his original testimony and became a prominent proponent of a government conspiracy strongly endorsing a new Congressional investigation of the WTC and Pentagon bombings. Strangely, according to Griffin, Jennings became very ill suddenly in August 2008, entered a hospital for treatment, and died a few days later. Jennings’ death was strangely a few days prior to the release of the first “WTC 7 Report” by the federally controlled National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Even more strange is the subsequent attempt of “Loose Change” producer Dylan Avery to investigate Jennings’ death through the agency of a female private investigator, who, a few days after beginning her investigation, contacted Dylan and told him that she was returning the fee she had collected from him for the proposed investigation. She also asked Dylan to never again contact her concerning Jennings. Since the publication of Griffin’s book, Dylan has attempted to visit, and interview, Jennings’ family, to find them mysteriously disappeared, vanished, with no apparent clue as to their whereabouts. Perhaps if something diabolical and sinister was discovered through independent investigation concerning a connection between Jennings’ death/his family’s disappearance and federal law enforcement (FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA), the federal government respond might refuse to respond citing national security as a reason.
If the foregoing scenario does not present, in the mind of a reasonable person, a cogently logical basis for suspecting federal government conspiratorial involvement in the happenings on 9/11, and a clarion call for a new independent investigation headed by non-political homicide investigators from cities and towns around the national, chosen randomly by a private-sector entity not affiliated in any way with government, that person is hardly reasonable. To place the task of investigating a serious crime on the shoulders of the most probable suspect is certainly unreasonable. Of course, the collective will of a majority of the American electorate, the real government of the people, would have to insist as a consensus that the foregoing be accomplished in a speedy but thorough fashion, and that the individuals of the federal legislative and executive agencies responsible for mass murder be tried for their crimes and, as at Nuremberg, be punished by execution. For what other punishment would fit the heinous enormity of such an awful crime?
The frighteningly logical conclusion that a reasonable person derives from a consideration of the foregoing facts is, of course, utterly disturbing to the mind of an American citizen who continues to believe in the basic good of the U.S. Government. Since 1948, the smothering blanket of what has come to be called “national security,” has been used to hide from the public heinous covert activities, sanctioned by a few corrupt U.S. senators and representatives, and directed by federal intelligence and law enforcement agencies against individual American citizens, labor unions, social and civic organizations, and foreign nations who actively oppose unjust U.S. domestic and foreign policies. Just like the Hoover-era FBI went well out its way to illegally harass and imprison active American communists, supporters of the Civil Rights movement, and conscientious Vietnam War protesters, the covert Machiavellian deceit of Watergate, Iran-Contra, and post-Patriot Act federal subversion of constitutional rights, all in the name of national security, has further endangered the sanctity of the American republic, and the basic intent of the Founding Fathers. Written within the Declaration of Independence is an allusion to the tendency of good government to eventually become corrupt, and opposed to the premise of natural law and the inalienable rights of the governed.
“…We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness-That to secure these Rights Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the Consent of the Governed, that when any form of government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness…”
It seems to me that federal efforts to maintain national security should be directed infinitely more toward preserving, protecting, and defending the basic inalienable rights conferred by nature’s God upon American citizens (as enumerated in the Bill of Rights) than to build and maintain an offensive Romanesque military and a vast intrusive computer surveillance complex, in order to imperialistically control the affairs of the world and of American citizens. Caring productively more about the quality of life of average American citizens is much more important than creating and perpetuating a duplicitious state of fear through the commission of mass murder in order to promote war and chaos. That is, if reasonable deductive logic is proven-out to be correct.
Recommend : Olevia Lt23Hvx Rca L32Wd22 E http://pipteam.com/jeannagrosch/ http://louisewilder.isay.co.za/
Lester Fitzgerald